The United States government and the state governments should call an immediate halt to executions. Capital punishment has been abolished by most modern industrialized nations, it is not a deterrent to murder, and its administration in the United States is replete with error, injustice, and discrimination.
It may seem surprising to the uninitiated that Singapore has the death penalty for drug crimes. But, as the minister said: This means that death sentences and executions are a regular part of the criminal justice system. Indeed, there have been two executions for drug offences just this month, killings which were condemned by UN human rights officials.
The idea that harsh drug laws such as the death penalty are effective is one actively promoted by Singapore.
And it is a belief now allegedly being adopted by US president Donald Trump. The Singapore myth Singapore consistently claims that it has one of the lowest rates of drug use in the world. Yet the government does not publish reliable data on drug use, making this statement impossible to independently verify.
As far back asthe reference group to the United Nations on HIV and injecting drug use found Singapore to be one of the only countries in Asia without reliable data on rates of drug injecting. More recently inHRI published its global state of harm reductionwhich similarly found almost no reliable data on levels of drug use in Singapore.
However, rather than being independently produced, this report reflects data provided by governments. This practice — which I have long referred to as data laundering — puts a UN seal of legitimacy on Singaporean government data that is at best unverified, and at worst politically expedient.
As with data on drug use, published figures on drug-related crime are neither robust nor transparent, again making such claims impossible to independently verify.
The annual statistical crime brief published by the Singapore police force does not provide any data on drug-related offences. This lack of data certainly does not reflect a lack of crime.
Hardly indicators of a shrinking drug market. Clearly the statistics used to promote the Singapore myth either do not exist, or fall apart under scrutiny.
As a result, any attempt to use the Singapore model as evidence of the effectiveness of the death penalty for drug offences is ludicrous. Given the unprecedented overdose crisis in the USAmericans deserve an evidence-based response. Pursuing myth-based drug policies will only make the problem worse.The death penalty system costs significantly more than a system where life without parole was the maximum penalty for murder.
This has been proven in every state that has studied the cost of its death penalty including New York, New Jersey, Indiana, Kansas, North Carolina, Texas, Florida, and California. May 18, · This is a project done for Lit and Justice for Pro Death Penalty.
There is evidence supporting our thesis. Our thesis is pro-death penalty, it is a . How and why the death penalty deters murder in contemporary America Too many churchmen simply ignore the evidence that the death penalty saves lives and promotes public order.
The death penalty is not an effective way to prevent or reduce crime. It risks the lives of innocent people and costs much more than a life sentence. The emotional impulse for revenge is not a sufficient justification for invoking a system of capital punishment, with all its accompanying problems and risks.
Capital punishment: Capital punishment, execution of an offender sentenced to death after conviction by a court of law of a criminal offense. Capital punishment should be distinguished from extrajudicial executions carried out without due process of law. The term death penalty is sometimes used interchangeably with.
Yes, we want to make sure there is accountability for crime and an effective deterrent in place; however, the death penalty has a message of “You killed one of us, so we’ll kill you”.
The state is actually using a murder to punish someone who committed a murder.