Email Copy Link Copied By the start of the twentieth century, it was clear that college athletics needed regulation. At the time, students were the ones who policed themselves, and it ended up very badly; resulting in over 18 deaths and serious injuries during the football season alone.
Those who say college student-athletes should not be paid argue that they receive scholarships as a form of payment for their talents. Would athletes be paid differently depending on the sport they play?
Where would the money even come from? The debate over whether student-athletes should be paid could go on and on. Yes, pay would vary, just as the universities with the more successful teams receive more television time or money than those with less successful teams.
Student-athletes are the ones working hard out on the court and field. Coaches might have a big effect on a team, but it is up to the athletes to get it done. Coaches receive bonuses for breaking records, reaching the offseason, and winning the big games; the athletes receive none of it, writes Tyson Hartnett for The Huffington Post.
Most profits from college athletics do not go towards academics. Instead, they go to the coaches, athletic directors, and some administrators, reports Edelman.
Student-athletes do not need to receive huge salaries like their coaches; rather, they could still be paid a reasonable amount relative to how much the program makes. Still, colleges and universities use their athletic success to promote their school and entice potential applicants.
Student-athletes would be paid for this and all the additional benefits they provide for their schools.
A timeout of the regular-season college football game between the University of Michigan at the University of Iowa Photo: If scholarships were taken out of the deal, and only salaries were given, then it would be more fair and affordable for the university, right?
If salaries were given, then these college student-athletes would have to pay taxes. Cash or a salary could be spent on wants rather than necessities, potentially leading the athletes into a debt they would not have with the benefit of a scholarship.
Furthermore, those who debate against paying student-athletes say it would change the very nature of college athletics. College student-athletes are given a rare opportunity. The next year, they may transfer to another school with an even higher offer. The money to pay athletes must come from somewhere, which might put the least-popular college programs at risk of being cut.
That, in turn, can deprive other students of their chance to gain the education and experience at the college of their dreams, since their desired program will no longer be offered, says Anderson. It is not their job to play sports; it is an extracurricular activity that is pursued while pursuing a higher education.
Student-athletes are going to school to learn, and many are lucky enough to do so for reduced cost, given the often generous athletic scholarships. If these athletes were paid, it would change their motives as students.
They are still in college—which is a privilege in itself—while pursuing their dreams of playing a sport. What do you think?FedLoan Servicing has problems and is the worst student loan servicer.
Their direct debit program is almost a scam for student loan users. Free Essay: Why College Athletes should be Paid Due to National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules and regulations no college athlete is able to. Many people have said to me in the past month, “I’m going to buy a home.” Or, “What do you think of the idea of me buying a home?” I like the second batch of people.
The debate over whether student-athletes should be paid could go on and on. Here’s a look at each side. Why student-athletes should be paid.
Being a college student-athlete is a full-time job, bouncing between the weight room, the court/field, classes, and film sessions. Why should a coach be getting paid more than any other tenured professor at a university, if it indeed is not a professional sport? Capitalism.
This is where it gets a bit tricky. Those that complain that these kids shouldn't get paid with million dollar contracts while in school are completely right. There are many advocates in favor of and many against the idea of paying athletes who play sports for their college or university.
We’ve got a breakdown of the pros and cons. The pros list the arguments for why college athletes should be paid and the cons list the arguments for .